aalto1 untyped-item.component.html

Comparative Study of Binder Stability for Aqueous Lithium-Ion and Solid-Boosted Flow Batteries

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Access rights

openAccess
CC BY

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as openAccess
publishedVersion

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Major/Subject

Mcode

Degree programme

Language

en

Pages

15

Series

Processes, Volume 13, issue 10

Abstract

The replacement of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) with environmentally friendly binders offers potential advantages in the development of aqueous lithium-ion batteries (ALIBs) and flow batteries (FBs) incorporating solid charge carriers (so-called solid boosters). This study investigates the electrochemical stability of ethyl cellulose and cross-linked gluten as substitutes for PVDF in LiMn2O4 (LMO) cathodes for aqueous Li-ion battery electrodes and solid boosters for FBs. The millimetre-scaled solid booster beads must be easily produced on a large scale, and at the same time, their charging and discharging must be reversible over long durations under electrolyte tank conditions. The binders were tested under standardized conditions for discharge capacity and cycling stability. Our results demonstrate that ethyl cellulose and cross-linked gluten can rival the electrochemical stability of PVDF, maintaining initial discharge capacities near 100 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C for LMO cathodes and exhibiting reasonable capacity retention over hundreds of cycles. This work supports the feasibility of sustainable electrode processing, provides promising directions for scalable, eco-friendly electrode fabrication methods, and highlights promising binder candidates for use in aqueous energy storage systems.

Description

| openaire: EC/H2020/950038/EU//Bi3BoostFlowBat

Other note

Citation

Sepp, S, Paalo, M & Peljo, P 2025, 'Comparative Study of Binder Stability for Aqueous Lithium-Ion and Solid-Boosted Flow Batteries', Processes, vol. 13, no. 10, 3338. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103338

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By